BaselineWatch
Desk
Your fleet and your work Fleetyour releases and the hardware they run onTriagewhat needs a decisionWatchlistthe products and platforms you runSaved searchesthe lists you come back to
This instance Sourceswhat is read, how often, under what termsDigestthe daily or weekly summary, and alerts
How it is drawn Appearancethe look and the colour schemeBrandingthe mark this instance wears
Owner sign-in

8.4.1 FSL I or II Campus Facility

NIST PIV and digital identity SP 800-116 Rev. 1 against SP 800-116
All changes in this version
removed 8 PACS Use Cases part of 8.4

Title changed

Before · SP 800-116

FSL I or II Campus Facility

After · SP 800-116 Rev. 1

FSL I or II Campus Facility

Control changed

Before · SP 800-116

Figure 8-3 depicts a security posture of a FSL I or II Campus Facility. It includes one or more Controlled areas that are available to authorized personnel. Since a FSL I or II Campus Facility can be considered a low-risk area, a PACS may or may not be maintained to preclude unauthorized entries. When PACS is maintained, SOME confidence in the identity of the cardholder should be achieved. Implementation of PIV authentication mechanisms for Controlled areas would be an appropriate countermeasure for security at this facility. CHUID + VIS, CAK, or BIO are the three recommended authentication mechanisms in this environment. Note that these authentication mechanisms validate “something you have” or “something you are” (one- factor authentication). Controlled area

Facility services Admin Buildings HQ

Access A Visitor Registration Controlled area

Facility services Admin Buildings HQ

Access A Visitor Registration

Figure 8-3: FSL II Campus Facility

After · SP 800-116 Rev. 1

Figure 8-3 depicts a security posture of a FSL I or II Campus Facility. It includes one or more Controlled areas that are available to authorized personnel. Since a FSL I or II Campus Facility can be considered a low-risk area, a PACS may or may not be maintained to preclude unauthorized entries. When PACS is maintained, SOME confidence in the identity of the cardholder should be achieved. Implementation of PIV authentication mechanisms for Controlled areas would be an appropriate countermeasure for security at this facility. CHUID + VIS, CAK, or BIO are the three recommended authentication mechanisms in this environment. Note that these authentication mechanisms validate “something you have” or “something you are” (one- factor authentication). Controlled area

Facility services Admin Buildings HQ

Access A Visitor Registration Controlled area

Facility services Admin Buildings HQ

Access A Visitor Registration

Figure 8-3: FSL II Campus Facility