BaselineWatch
Desk

A.2 Multilateral Federation Network

NIST PIV and digital identity SP 800-217 (Draft)
All changes in this version
first version loaded Appendix A Examples 1221 part of A

Title

Multilateral Federation Network

Control

Agencies A, B, and C each have a home agency IdP running OpenID Connect for their PIV identity accounts. All three agencies join a multilateral federation in which the federation authority independently verifies that each home agency IdP represents the agency in question. The federation authority publishes the home agency IdP records for all agencies that are part of the multilateral federation. This publication allows RPs 1257 1258 1259

1260 1261 1262 1263

1264 1265 1266

1267 1268 1269 1270

1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277

1278 1279 1280

1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286

1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 within the federation to discover which IdP is to be used to access accounts for a given agency under the rules of the federation agreement.

RPs X and Y wish to allow logins from agencies A, B, and C, and the RPs declare their intent and a list of required attributes to the federation authority. The federation authority assesses both RP requests and adds them to the multilateral federation. This allows both RPs to register at each of the three separate IdPs as needed for each agency.

Both RPs interface directly with each of the three IdPs and not through a federation proxy. When a new IdP or RP is added to the multilateral federation agreement, the existing IdPs and RPs are notified of the new component and its parameters.

The IdPs and RPs establish a shared signaling channel under the auspices of the federation authority. This allows any IdP and any RP to report suspicious or malicious behavior that involves a specific account to the rest of the members under the federation authority.