BaselineWatch
Desk

3.2.4 Attestation

NIST PIV and digital identity SP 800-63B-4 against SP 800-63B
All changes in this version
added 3 Authenticator and Verifier Requirements part of 3.2

Title changed

Before · SP 800-63B

After · SP 800-63B-4

Attestation

Control changed

Before · SP 800-63B

After · SP 800-63B-4

The CSP needs to have a reliable basis for evaluating the characteristics of the authenticator, such as the inclusion of a signed attestation. An attestation is information conveyed to the CSP, generally when an authenticator is bound, regarding that connected authenticator or the endpoint involved in an authentication operation. Information conveyed by attestation MAY include but is not limited to:

• The provenance (e.g., manufacturer or supplier certification), health, and integrity of the authenticator and endpoint

• Security features of the authenticator

• Security and performance characteristics of biometric sensors

• Sensor modality

• Properties of the authentication key

Attestations SHALL be signed using a digital signature that provides at least the minimum security strength specified in the latest revision of [SP800-131A] (i.e., 112 bits as of the date of this publication).

Verifiers in federal enterprise systems 2 SHOULD use attestation features to verify the capabilities and sources of authenticators. In other applications, attestation information MAY be used as part of a verifier’s risk-based authentication decisions.

2 Federal enterprise systems include those considered in scope for PIV guidance, such as government contractors, government employees, and mission partners. It does not include government-to-consumer or public-facing use cases.