Learn: where a rule comes from
The ladder gives you the four words — standard, baseline, control, setting. This page answers the next question: who wrote the rulebook, and under whose authority. Every control on this site arrived by the same route. A law obliges somebody to act; a policy says what acting looks like; a framework structures the work; a catalogue holds the controls; a baseline picks the ones your kind of system gets; a setting is how one of them is enforced on a real device; and a check proves it was. Each step below names its publishers, with the address their own words live at and what it takes to read them.
The chain, in one picture
- Law and contract what obliges anyone to do this at all
- Policy what the government or agency directs, under that law
- Framework how the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise
- Control catalogue the controls themselves, written once for everyone
- Baseline the controls chosen for one kind of system
- Configuration setting how a control is enforced on a real device
- Check and evidence how conformance is expressed, measured and proved
Nothing is obliged to use the whole chain. A private business usually joins at the framework or the setting and has no policy rung at all; a DoD system has every rung and a second committee besides. That is what "normalised" means in practice, and the three traces below walk it.
Who publishes what, and for whom
The rows are the steps of the chain; the columns are who the publisher writes for. Reading across one row answers the question this page exists for: the same job, as NIST, DISA, NASA, CIS and the ACSC each answer it. Showing Outside the US alone.
| Step | Outside the USthe same job, done by another country's body |
|---|---|
| Law and contractwhat obliges anyone to do this at all | — |
| Policywhat the government or agency directs, under that law | — |
| Frameworkhow the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise | NIST CSF 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 27001 and 27002Essential Eight and the ISMCyber Assessment Framework |
| Control cataloguethe controls themselves, written once for everyone | — |
| Baselinethe controls chosen for one kind of system | — |
| Configuration settinghow a control is enforced on a real device | CIS Benchmarks |
| Check and evidencehow conformance is expressed, measured and proved | — |
The same control, traced three ways
One control — a device that locks itself after a period of inactivity — carried down three different ladders. The control barely changes. Everything above and below it does.
No trace written for Outside the US yet; all three are above.
How they are normalised
Four mechanisms do nearly all the work of turning one body's rules into another's, and each one is public.
- Control Correlation Identifiers — DISA breaks each NIST SP 800-53 control statement into single testable assertions and numbers them. A STIG rule cites the CCI, the CCI names the control, and a pile of findings about registry values becomes an answer about controls. This is the one joint that makes a DoD scan report legible to a civilian assessor.
- OSCAL — a catalogue, a profile and a baseline as data rather than prose. A baseline becomes a document that says "this catalogue, these controls, these parameters", which a program resolves. It is how this instance reads 800-53 and 800-171 at all.
- SCAP and the National Checklist Program — XCCDF for the checklist, OVAL for the test, and the National Checklist Program as the public shelf. The same STIG exists twice: as prose for a person and as content for a scanner.
- macOS Security Compliance Project — the worked example. Each macOS rule carries its references to 800-53, 800-171, the STIG, CIS and CMMC at once, and the build emits whichever baseline you asked for. One rule, many citations: that is normalisation done at the source instead of afterwards.
And the two paths into private business
Nothing on this page obliges a company by itself. Federal rules reach private business two ways. By contract: DFARS 252.204-7012 flows NIST SP 800-171 down to every defense supplier, and CMMC audits it; FAR 52.204-21 sets a fifteen-requirement floor in almost every other federal contract. By market: FedRAMP baselines is met once and sold to every agency. Everything else — NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Critical Security Controls, ISO/IEC 27001 and 27002 — is adopted because a customer asked or because it is a good idea, and a company can leave at any time. Which of those applies to you is the first thing to settle, because it decides whether the rest of this page is a requirement or a reading list.
What this site does with all of it
One pipeline, the same for every publisher: fetch, keep the exact bytes, normalise into requirements or settings, diff field by field against the previous version, and record the publisher's own stated reason where there is one. So the change register can show a control before and after; Controls searches every tracked catalogue at once; and Baselines builds the strictest published set for a platform and lets you trim it. A machine-generated summary is always labelled as one, and never replaces the publisher's words.
Every body, with its source
5 of 35 publishers, writing for Outside the US, at the Framework step · show all
NIST
The Cybersecurity Framework: six functions — govern, identify, protect, detect, respond, recover — with no control text of its own, and informative references out to the catalogues that have it.
The usual entry point for a private business, because it obliges nothing and organises everything. It is a map, not a rulebook.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- CSET (CISA's assessment tool)
- Read it at
- The framework public
- CSF 2.0 (CSWP 29) public
- Mapped to others
Center for Internet Security
Eighteen controls in three implementation groups, ordered by what stops the most attacks for the least work.
The private-sector counterpart to a federal catalogue: prioritised rather than complete, and written to be started on a Monday.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- CIS Benchmarks, CSET (CISA's assessment tool)
- Read it at
- CIS Controls free account
- Mapped to others
- Mappings to 800-53, CSF, ISO 27001 free account
ISO and IEC
27001 is the certifiable management system; 27002 is its control guidance. The pair is what most of the world outside US government means by 'the standard'.
The one on this page a company is certified against rather than assessed under, and the one a customer in Europe or Asia is most likely to ask for.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- ISO/IEC 27001 your own licence ISO sells its standards; the abstract is public
- Mapped to others
Australian Signals Directorate — ACSC
Eight mitigation strategies at three maturity levels, over the Information Security Manual's full control set.
The clearest example of another country doing the same job differently: where NIST publishes a thousand controls and lets you tailor, the ACSC publishes eight and tells you how far to take each.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- Essential Eight public
- Information Security Manual public
UK National Cyber Security Centre
Fourteen outcome-based principles assessed on a scale, with Cyber Essentials underneath it as the small-organisation floor.
Outcomes rather than controls: the CAF asks whether you achieved the objective, where a STIG asks whether a registry value is set.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- The CAF public
Names that collide
Most of the difficulty in learning this field is that several different things share a name. Each reading below is real; none of them is the wrong answer, so the thing to do is say which one you mean.
- CSET
- NASA OCIO — the Cybersecurity Standards and Engineering Team, which writes NASA's own configuration specifications (the ASCS set). source agency sign-in
- CISA — the Cyber Security Evaluation Tool, free software for assessing yourself against a chosen standard. source public
- Georgetown University — the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, a policy research centre — no controls, no baselines. source public
- FISMA, not FISA
- FISMA — the Federal Information Security Modernization Act: the statute behind every federal control on this site. source public
- FISA — the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: surveillance authority law. It publishes no controls, baselines or standards, and nothing on this site derives from it. source public
- CSI
- NIST, CSRC and NVD
- 800-53, 800-53A, 800-53B
What this page is not
It is not legal advice, and it is not a compliance determination: whether a given system is obliged to meet a given baseline is a question for the people who authorise it. Every link here goes to a publisher's own address, and the access chip says what that publisher requires of a reader — this site adds no access to anything. Nothing restricted is reproduced here. For the vocabulary, see how to read this site; for what this instance is actually holding, All standards and the change register.