Learn: where a rule comes from
The ladder gives you the four words — standard, baseline, control, setting. This page answers the next question: who wrote the rulebook, and under whose authority. Every control on this site arrived by the same route. A law obliges somebody to act; a policy says what acting looks like; a framework structures the work; a catalogue holds the controls; a baseline picks the ones your kind of system gets; a setting is how one of them is enforced on a real device; and a check proves it was. Each step below names its publishers, with the address their own words live at and what it takes to read them.
The chain, in one picture
- Law and contract what obliges anyone to do this at all
- Policy what the government or agency directs, under that law
- Framework how the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise
- Control catalogue the controls themselves, written once for everyone
- Baseline the controls chosen for one kind of system
- Configuration setting how a control is enforced on a real device
- Check and evidence how conformance is expressed, measured and proved
Nothing is obliged to use the whole chain. A private business usually joins at the framework or the setting and has no policy rung at all; a DoD system has every rung and a second committee besides. That is what "normalised" means in practice, and the three traces below walk it.
Who publishes what, and for whom
The rows are the steps of the chain; the columns are who the publisher writes for. Reading across one row answers the question this page exists for: the same job, as NIST, DISA, NASA, CIS and the ACSC each answer it.
The same control, traced three ways
One control — a device that locks itself after a period of inactivity — carried down three different ladders. The control barely changes. Everything above and below it does.
A federal civilian system
The plain FISMA chain: obliged by statute, categorised, baselined, enforced, assessed.
-
Law and contract FISMA 2014
The agency must run an information security programme, and NIST's standards are mandatory for this system.
-
Policy OMB Circular A-130
OMB tells the agency what that programme looks like and binds it to the NIST framework.
-
Framework FIPS 199 and FIPS 200
The system is categorised moderate for confidentiality, integrity and availability.
-
Control catalogue NIST SP 800-53
AC-11 Device Lock: prevent further access by initiating a device lock after a period of inactivity.
-
Baseline NIST SP 800-53B
The moderate baseline includes AC-11, and the agency's parameter sets the period at 15 minutes.
-
Configuration setting macOS Security Compliance Project
On macOS: a screensaver idle time of 900 seconds, with the lock delay at zero, in a configuration profile.
-
Check and evidence NIST SP 800-53A
The assessor examines the profile and tests a machine; the result goes in the assessment that supports the authorisation.
A DoD system
The same control, a different committee, and a rule concrete enough to run.
-
Law and contract FISMA 2014
FISMA applies, and for a national security system CNSS policy applies instead of the civilian line.
-
Policy DoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01
DoD adopts the RMF and puts DISA's content in force: the STIG is policy, not advice.
-
Framework NIST SP 800-37 (RMF)
Categorise, select, implement, assess, authorise, monitor — with an authorising official who signs.
-
Control catalogue CNSSI 1253
The 800-53 catalogue with the national security baselines and overlays applied, so the selected set differs from the civilian one.
-
Baseline DISA Security Requirements Guides
The Operating System SRG: the OS must initiate a session lock after a period of inactivity.
-
Configuration setting DISA STIGs
A named rule for this exact Windows release, CAT II, with check text and fix text — the registry value, and the command to set it.
-
Check and evidence Control Correlation Identifiers
The rule cites a CCI, the CCI points back at AC-11, and a scanner's XCCDF result rolls the finding up to the control.
A private business
Nothing here is obliged by FISMA. It arrives by contract, by market, or by choice.
-
Law and contract DFARS 252.204-7012
A defense contract flows SP 800-171 down — or no contract does, and everything below is voluntary.
-
Policy nobody
There is no rung here. No OMB circular reaches a private company; its own policy is the only policy.
-
Framework NIST CSF 2.0
CSF 2.0 organises the work by function, or CIS Controls prioritises it, or ISO 27001 certifies it — whichever the customer asks for.
-
Control catalogue NIST SP 800-171
3.1.10: use session lock with pattern-hiding displays to prevent access after a period of inactivity.
-
Baseline CIS Benchmarks
The CIS Benchmark for the platform, Level 1 for a workstation, Level 2 where the data warrants it.
-
Configuration setting Microsoft security baselines
The vendor's own baseline sets the machine inactivity limit, imported as a GPO or an Intune policy.
-
Check and evidence CMMC
A CMMC assessment, a customer's questionnaire, or an ISO audit — somebody outside the company asks for the evidence.
How they are normalised
Four mechanisms do nearly all the work of turning one body's rules into another's, and each one is public.
- Control Correlation Identifiers — DISA breaks each NIST SP 800-53 control statement into single testable assertions and numbers them. A STIG rule cites the CCI, the CCI names the control, and a pile of findings about registry values becomes an answer about controls. This is the one joint that makes a DoD scan report legible to a civilian assessor.
- OSCAL — a catalogue, a profile and a baseline as data rather than prose. A baseline becomes a document that says "this catalogue, these controls, these parameters", which a program resolves. It is how this instance reads 800-53 and 800-171 at all.
- SCAP and the National Checklist Program — XCCDF for the checklist, OVAL for the test, and the National Checklist Program as the public shelf. The same STIG exists twice: as prose for a person and as content for a scanner.
- macOS Security Compliance Project — the worked example. Each macOS rule carries its references to 800-53, 800-171, the STIG, CIS and CMMC at once, and the build emits whichever baseline you asked for. One rule, many citations: that is normalisation done at the source instead of afterwards.
And the two paths into private business
Nothing on this page obliges a company by itself. Federal rules reach private business two ways. By contract: DFARS 252.204-7012 flows NIST SP 800-171 down to every defense supplier, and CMMC audits it; FAR 52.204-21 sets a fifteen-requirement floor in almost every other federal contract. By market: FedRAMP baselines is met once and sold to every agency. Everything else — NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Critical Security Controls, ISO/IEC 27001 and 27002 — is adopted because a customer asked or because it is a good idea, and a company can leave at any time. Which of those applies to you is the first thing to settle, because it decides whether the rest of this page is a requirement or a reading list.
What this site does with all of it
One pipeline, the same for every publisher: fetch, keep the exact bytes, normalise into requirements or settings, diff field by field against the previous version, and record the publisher's own stated reason where there is one. So the change register can show a control before and after; Controls searches every tracked catalogue at once; and Baselines builds the strictest published set for a platform and lets you trim it. A machine-generated summary is always labelled as one, and never replaces the publisher's words.
Every body, with its source
8 of 35 publishers, at the Framework step · show all
NIST
FIPS 199 categorises a system low, moderate or high against confidentiality, integrity and availability; FIPS 200 sets the minimum requirements that follow.
The hinge of the whole federal chain: the category a system is given here is what decides which baseline it gets later.
- Derives from
- FISMA 2014
- Feeds into
- NIST SP 800-37 (RMF), NIST SP 800-53, NIST SP 800-53B
- Read it at
NIST
The Risk Management Framework: seven steps from preparing and categorising through selecting, implementing, assessing, authorising and monitoring controls.
The framework is the verb and the catalogue is the noun. RMF is how a control gets selected, assessed and signed off by somebody with a name.
- Derives from
- FISMA 2014, OMB Circular A-130, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- SP 800-37 Rev. 2 public
NIST
The Cybersecurity Framework: six functions — govern, identify, protect, detect, respond, recover — with no control text of its own, and informative references out to the catalogues that have it.
The usual entry point for a private business, because it obliges nothing and organises everything. It is a map, not a rulebook.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- CSET (CISA's assessment tool)
- Read it at
- The framework public
- CSF 2.0 (CSWP 29) public
- Mapped to others
US Department of Defense CIO
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification: the assessment and certification programme that turns SP 800-171 from a promise in a contract into an audited level.
The answer to 'who checks?' in private business. Level 2 is the SP 800-171 requirement set, assessed by a third party rather than self-attested.
- Derives from
- DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171 (and further up: NIST SP 800-53B, NIST SP 800-53, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200, FISMA 2014)
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- CMMC at DoD CIO public
Center for Internet Security
Eighteen controls in three implementation groups, ordered by what stops the most attacks for the least work.
The private-sector counterpart to a federal catalogue: prioritised rather than complete, and written to be started on a Monday.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- CIS Benchmarks, CSET (CISA's assessment tool)
- Read it at
- CIS Controls free account
- Mapped to others
- Mappings to 800-53, CSF, ISO 27001 free account
ISO and IEC
27001 is the certifiable management system; 27002 is its control guidance. The pair is what most of the world outside US government means by 'the standard'.
The one on this page a company is certified against rather than assessed under, and the one a customer in Europe or Asia is most likely to ask for.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- ISO/IEC 27001 your own licence ISO sells its standards; the abstract is public
- Mapped to others
Australian Signals Directorate — ACSC
Eight mitigation strategies at three maturity levels, over the Information Security Manual's full control set.
The clearest example of another country doing the same job differently: where NIST publishes a thousand controls and lets you tailor, the ACSC publishes eight and tells you how far to take each.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- Essential Eight public
- Information Security Manual public
UK National Cyber Security Centre
Fourteen outcome-based principles assessed on a scale, with Cyber Essentials underneath it as the small-organisation floor.
Outcomes rather than controls: the CAF asks whether you achieved the objective, where a STIG asks whether a registry value is set.
- Derives from
- nothing on this page — it is a root
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- The CAF public
Names that collide
Most of the difficulty in learning this field is that several different things share a name. Each reading below is real; none of them is the wrong answer, so the thing to do is say which one you mean.
- CSET
- NASA OCIO — the Cybersecurity Standards and Engineering Team, which writes NASA's own configuration specifications (the ASCS set). source agency sign-in
- CISA — the Cyber Security Evaluation Tool, free software for assessing yourself against a chosen standard. source public
- Georgetown University — the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, a policy research centre — no controls, no baselines. source public
- FISMA, not FISA
- FISMA — the Federal Information Security Modernization Act: the statute behind every federal control on this site. source public
- FISA — the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: surveillance authority law. It publishes no controls, baselines or standards, and nothing on this site derives from it. source public
- CSI
- NIST, CSRC and NVD
- 800-53, 800-53A, 800-53B
What this page is not
It is not legal advice, and it is not a compliance determination: whether a given system is obliged to meet a given baseline is a question for the people who authorise it. Every link here goes to a publisher's own address, and the access chip says what that publisher requires of a reader — this site adds no access to anything. Nothing restricted is reproduced here. For the vocabulary, see how to read this site; for what this instance is actually holding, All standards and the change register.