BaselineWatch
8 publishers shown
Desk

Learn: where a rule comes from

The ladder gives you the four words — standard, baseline, control, setting. This page answers the next question: who wrote the rulebook, and under whose authority. Every control on this site arrived by the same route. A law obliges somebody to act; a policy says what acting looks like; a framework structures the work; a catalogue holds the controls; a baseline picks the ones your kind of system gets; a setting is how one of them is enforced on a real device; and a check proves it was. Each step below names its publishers, with the address their own words live at and what it takes to read them.

The chain, in one picture

1 Law and contract 3 publishers 2 Policy 5 publishers 3 Framework 8 publishers 4 Control catalogue 3 publishers 5 Baseline 6 publishers 6 Configuration setting 6 publishers 7 Check and evidence 4 publishers
  1. Law and contract what obliges anyone to do this at all
  2. Policy what the government or agency directs, under that law
  3. Framework how the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise
  4. Control catalogue the controls themselves, written once for everyone
  5. Baseline the controls chosen for one kind of system
  6. Configuration setting how a control is enforced on a real device
  7. Check and evidence how conformance is expressed, measured and proved

Nothing is obliged to use the whole chain. A private business usually joins at the framework or the setting and has no policy rung at all; a DoD system has every rung and a second committee besides. That is what "normalised" means in practice, and the three traces below walk it.

Who publishes what, and for whom

The rows are the steps of the chain; the columns are who the publisher writes for. Reading across one row answers the question this page exists for: the same job, as NIST, DISA, NASA, CIS and the ACSC each answer it.

Which body publishes at each step of the chain, by who it writes for
StepUS federal civilianagencies under FISMA and OMB, and their cloud providersUS defenseDoD systems and national security systemsNASAan agency's own layer above NISTPrivate businessadopted by contract or by choice, never by FISMAOutside the USthe same job, done by another country's body
Law and contractwhat obliges anyone to do this at all FISMA 2014FISMA 2014DFARS 252.204-7012FISMA 2014FAR 52.204-21DFARS 252.204-7012—
Policywhat the government or agency directs, under that law OMB Circular A-130CISA directivesDoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01CNSS policyOMB Circular A-130NPR 2810.1——
Frameworkhow the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise FIPS 199 and FIPS 200NIST SP 800-37 (RMF)NIST CSF 2.0FIPS 199 and FIPS 200NIST SP 800-37 (RMF)CMMCFIPS 199 and FIPS 200NIST SP 800-37 (RMF)NIST CSF 2.0CMMCCIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 27001 and 27002NIST CSF 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 27001 and 27002Essential Eight and the ISMCyber Assessment Framework
Control cataloguethe controls themselves, written once for everyone NIST SP 800-53NIST SP 800-53ANIST SP 800-53NIST SP 800-53ANIST SP 800-171NIST SP 800-53NIST SP 800-53ANIST SP 800-171—
Baselinethe controls chosen for one kind of system NIST SP 800-53BFedRAMP baselinesmacOS Security Compliance ProjectCNSSI 1253DISA Security Requirements GuidesmacOS Security Compliance ProjectNIST SP 800-53BNASA-SPEC-2600 (ASCS)macOS Security Compliance ProjectFedRAMP baselinesmacOS Security Compliance Project—
Configuration settinghow a control is enforced on a real device DISA STIGsDISA STIG GPO packageDISA STIG Intune packageMicrosoft security baselinesCIS BenchmarksNSA Cybersecurity Information SheetsDISA STIGsDISA STIG GPO packageDISA STIG Intune packageMicrosoft security baselinesNSA Cybersecurity Information SheetsDISA STIGsMicrosoft security baselinesCIS BenchmarksDISA STIGsMicrosoft security baselinesCIS BenchmarksNSA Cybersecurity Information SheetsCIS Benchmarks
Check and evidencehow conformance is expressed, measured and proved Control Correlation IdentifiersOSCALSCAP and the National Checklist ProgramCSET (CISA's assessment tool)Control Correlation IdentifiersOSCALSCAP and the National Checklist ProgramControl Correlation IdentifiersOSCALSCAP and the National Checklist ProgramOSCALSCAP and the National Checklist ProgramCSET (CISA's assessment tool)—

The same control, traced three ways

One control — a device that locks itself after a period of inactivity — carried down three different ladders. The control barely changes. Everything above and below it does.

A federal civilian system

The plain FISMA chain: obliged by statute, categorised, baselined, enforced, assessed.

  1. Law and contract FISMA 2014

    The agency must run an information security programme, and NIST's standards are mandatory for this system.

  2. Policy OMB Circular A-130

    OMB tells the agency what that programme looks like and binds it to the NIST framework.

  3. Framework FIPS 199 and FIPS 200

    The system is categorised moderate for confidentiality, integrity and availability.

  4. Control catalogue NIST SP 800-53

    AC-11 Device Lock: prevent further access by initiating a device lock after a period of inactivity.

  5. Baseline NIST SP 800-53B

    The moderate baseline includes AC-11, and the agency's parameter sets the period at 15 minutes.

  6. Configuration setting macOS Security Compliance Project

    On macOS: a screensaver idle time of 900 seconds, with the lock delay at zero, in a configuration profile.

  7. Check and evidence NIST SP 800-53A

    The assessor examines the profile and tests a machine; the result goes in the assessment that supports the authorisation.

A DoD system

The same control, a different committee, and a rule concrete enough to run.

  1. Law and contract FISMA 2014

    FISMA applies, and for a national security system CNSS policy applies instead of the civilian line.

  2. Policy DoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01

    DoD adopts the RMF and puts DISA's content in force: the STIG is policy, not advice.

  3. Framework NIST SP 800-37 (RMF)

    Categorise, select, implement, assess, authorise, monitor — with an authorising official who signs.

  4. Control catalogue CNSSI 1253

    The 800-53 catalogue with the national security baselines and overlays applied, so the selected set differs from the civilian one.

  5. Baseline DISA Security Requirements Guides

    The Operating System SRG: the OS must initiate a session lock after a period of inactivity.

  6. Configuration setting DISA STIGs

    A named rule for this exact Windows release, CAT II, with check text and fix text — the registry value, and the command to set it.

  7. Check and evidence Control Correlation Identifiers

    The rule cites a CCI, the CCI points back at AC-11, and a scanner's XCCDF result rolls the finding up to the control.

A private business

Nothing here is obliged by FISMA. It arrives by contract, by market, or by choice.

  1. Law and contract DFARS 252.204-7012

    A defense contract flows SP 800-171 down — or no contract does, and everything below is voluntary.

  2. Policy nobody

    There is no rung here. No OMB circular reaches a private company; its own policy is the only policy.

  3. Framework NIST CSF 2.0

    CSF 2.0 organises the work by function, or CIS Controls prioritises it, or ISO 27001 certifies it — whichever the customer asks for.

  4. Control catalogue NIST SP 800-171

    3.1.10: use session lock with pattern-hiding displays to prevent access after a period of inactivity.

  5. Baseline CIS Benchmarks

    The CIS Benchmark for the platform, Level 1 for a workstation, Level 2 where the data warrants it.

  6. Configuration setting Microsoft security baselines

    The vendor's own baseline sets the machine inactivity limit, imported as a GPO or an Intune policy.

  7. Check and evidence CMMC

    A CMMC assessment, a customer's questionnaire, or an ISO audit — somebody outside the company asks for the evidence.

How they are normalised

Four mechanisms do nearly all the work of turning one body's rules into another's, and each one is public.

And the two paths into private business

Nothing on this page obliges a company by itself. Federal rules reach private business two ways. By contract: DFARS 252.204-7012 flows NIST SP 800-171 down to every defense supplier, and CMMC audits it; FAR 52.204-21 sets a fifteen-requirement floor in almost every other federal contract. By market: FedRAMP baselines is met once and sold to every agency. Everything else — NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Critical Security Controls, ISO/IEC 27001 and 27002 — is adopted because a customer asked or because it is a good idea, and a company can leave at any time. Which of those applies to you is the first thing to settle, because it decides whether the rest of this page is a requirement or a reading list.

What this site does with all of it

One pipeline, the same for every publisher: fetch, keep the exact bytes, normalise into requirements or settings, diff field by field against the previous version, and record the publisher's own stated reason where there is one. So the change register can show a control before and after; Controls searches every tracked catalogue at once; and Baselines builds the strictest published set for a platform and lets you trim it. A machine-generated summary is always labelled as one, and never replaces the publisher's words.

Every body, with its source

8 of 35 publishers, at the Framework step · show all

Frameworkhow the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise

NIST

FIPS 199 categorises a system low, moderate or high against confidentiality, integrity and availability; FIPS 200 sets the minimum requirements that follow.

The hinge of the whole federal chain: the category a system is given here is what decides which baseline it gets later.

Derives from
FISMA 2014
Feeds into
NIST SP 800-37 (RMF), NIST SP 800-53, NIST SP 800-53B
Read it at

NIST

The Risk Management Framework: seven steps from preparing and categorising through selecting, implementing, assessing, authorising and monitoring controls.

The framework is the verb and the catalogue is the noun. RMF is how a control gets selected, assessed and signed off by somebody with a name.

Derives from
FISMA 2014, OMB Circular A-130, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at

NIST

The Cybersecurity Framework: six functions — govern, identify, protect, detect, respond, recover — with no control text of its own, and informative references out to the catalogues that have it.

The usual entry point for a private business, because it obliges nothing and organises everything. It is a map, not a rulebook.

Derives from
nothing on this page — it is a root
Feeds into
CSET (CISA's assessment tool)
Read it at
Mapped to others

US Department of Defense CIO

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification: the assessment and certification programme that turns SP 800-171 from a promise in a contract into an audited level.

The answer to 'who checks?' in private business. Level 2 is the SP 800-171 requirement set, assessed by a third party rather than self-attested.

Derives from
DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171 (and further up: NIST SP 800-53B, NIST SP 800-53, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200, FISMA 2014)
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at

Center for Internet Security

Eighteen controls in three implementation groups, ordered by what stops the most attacks for the least work.

The private-sector counterpart to a federal catalogue: prioritised rather than complete, and written to be started on a Monday.

Derives from
nothing on this page — it is a root
Feeds into
CIS Benchmarks, CSET (CISA's assessment tool)
Read it at
Mapped to others

ISO and IEC

27001 is the certifiable management system; 27002 is its control guidance. The pair is what most of the world outside US government means by 'the standard'.

The one on this page a company is certified against rather than assessed under, and the one a customer in Europe or Asia is most likely to ask for.

Derives from
nothing on this page — it is a root
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at
  • ISO/IEC 27001 your own licence ISO sells its standards; the abstract is public
Mapped to others

Australian Signals Directorate — ACSC

Eight mitigation strategies at three maturity levels, over the Information Security Manual's full control set.

The clearest example of another country doing the same job differently: where NIST publishes a thousand controls and lets you tailor, the ACSC publishes eight and tells you how far to take each.

Derives from
nothing on this page — it is a root
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at

UK National Cyber Security Centre

Fourteen outcome-based principles assessed on a scale, with Cyber Essentials underneath it as the small-organisation floor.

Outcomes rather than controls: the CAF asks whether you achieved the objective, where a STIG asks whether a registry value is set.

Derives from
nothing on this page — it is a root
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at

Names that collide

Most of the difficulty in learning this field is that several different things share a name. Each reading below is real; none of them is the wrong answer, so the thing to do is say which one you mean.

CSET
  • NASA OCIO — the Cybersecurity Standards and Engineering Team, which writes NASA's own configuration specifications (the ASCS set). source agency sign-in
  • CISA — the Cyber Security Evaluation Tool, free software for assessing yourself against a chosen standard. source public
  • Georgetown University — the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, a policy research centre — no controls, no baselines. source public
FISMA, not FISA
  • FISMA — the Federal Information Security Modernization Act: the statute behind every federal control on this site. source public
  • FISA — the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: surveillance authority law. It publishes no controls, baselines or standards, and nothing on this site derives from it. source public
CSI
  • NSA — a Cybersecurity Information Sheet: short hardening guidance on one subject. source public
  • CIS — the Center for Internet Security — the Controls and the Benchmarks. Easy to type as CSI and mean something else entirely. source public
NIST, CSRC and NVD
  • NIST — the institute itself, which publishes the standards. source public
  • CSRC — the Computer Security Resource Center: where the publications live. source public
  • NVD — the National Vulnerability Database: CVEs and their scores, run by NIST but nothing to do with the standards. source public
800-53, 800-53A, 800-53B
  • SP 800-53 — the control catalogue: what must be true. source public
  • SP 800-53A — the assessment procedures: how an assessor would be convinced. source public
  • SP 800-53B — the baselines: which controls a low, moderate or high system gets. source public

What this page is not

It is not legal advice, and it is not a compliance determination: whether a given system is obliged to meet a given baseline is a question for the people who authorise it. Every link here goes to a publisher's own address, and the access chip says what that publisher requires of a reader — this site adds no access to anything. Nothing restricted is reproduced here. For the vocabulary, see how to read this site; for what this instance is actually holding, All standards and the change register.