Vulnerabilities
All
My stack
Known exploited
Public exploit
Critical (9+)
Likely exploited (EPSS ≥ 50%)
Changed, 24 h
New, 24 h
Sort:
risk
modified
published
CVSS
EPSS
| CVE | CVSS | EPSS | Vendor, product | Description | Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-70420 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-51847 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-51849 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-69290 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2025. Notes: none | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-69291 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2025. Notes: none | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-14470 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-14883 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-68016. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2025-68016. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-68016 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-13602 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-13933 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-12500. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2025-12500. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-12500 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-13965 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-12500. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2025-12500. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-12500 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-53706 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2025. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-53517 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2025. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-53815 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2025. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-54758 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2025. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-13890 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-12494. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2025-12494. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-12494 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-51850 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-63750 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-21709. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2026-21709. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-21709 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-61081 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2025-12127 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-98556 | unscored | 0.00% | no CPE yet | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gve: DQO: reject TSO packets with an out of range MSS gve_prep_tso() notes that the device requires the MSS to be <= 9728, but does not enforce it, assuming the 9K MTU enforced by the hypervisor and the 64KB limit on TSO sizes are enough. This does not hold for packets that were not generated locally. A guest behind a tap, or any packet socket user, can provide an arbitrary gso_size in virtio_net_hdr. Layer 2 forwarding does not check the MTU for GSO packets (is_skb_forwardable()), and gso_features_check() only bounds skb->len and gso_segs, never gso_size. Such a packet reaches gve_tx_fill_tso_ctx_desc(), which puts gso_size into the mss field of the TSO context descriptor. This field is 14 bits wide, so a gso_size of 16384 is silently turned into an MSS of zero. Drop these packets from gve_prep_tso(), and make sure that gve_features_check_dqo() leaves their GSO bits alone: skb_segment() splits at gso_size regardless of the MTU, so falling back to software segmentation would give the device non TSO packets bigger than the 9728 bytes it supports. Note that the device can still be given oversized non TSO packets when the stack segments in software for other reasons, for instance after TSO has been disabled with ethtool. This is a generic issue, because the MTU check is skipped for GSO packets in the forwarding path, and is addressed separately. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-104758 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-73364. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-73364. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-73364 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2025-8903 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-2052. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-2052 Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-2052 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2025-12993 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-67968. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2025-67968. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-67968 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7360 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7361 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7362 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7363 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7364 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7365 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7366 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7367 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7464 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7465 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7481 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7482 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7483 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7484 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7485 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7486 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7487 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7491 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7492 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7493 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7494 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7495 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7496 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7497 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7590 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7593 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
| CVE-2016-7631 | unscored | — | no CPE yet | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 18 Oct |
Download these 1000 as CSV (the first thousand in this order) · subscribe to this list.
EPSS scores: 2026-10-28. NVD cursor: 2026-10-29 00:22. The News page shows only notable CVEs (KEV, your stack, new criticals, EPSS over 50%, or active exploitation per SSVC); this table has all of them.