Vulnerabilities
All
My stack
Known exploited
Public exploit
Critical (9+)
Likely exploited (EPSS ≥ 50%)
Changed, 24 h
New, 24 h
Sort:
risk
modified
published
CVSS
EPSS
| CVE | CVSS | EPSS | Vendor, product | Description | Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-85542 | 8.8 high | 3.0% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the GIM bundle import functionality. An authenticated attacker can provide a crafted GIM bundle that causes attacker-controlled arguments to be passed to the tar command, resulting in arbitrary command execution with elevated privileges on the Central Manager. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84278 | 7.2 high | 2.0% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the SUID-root ssh_config_wrapper component. An authenticated high-privileged user can inject arbitrary commands through attacker-controlled arguments, resulting in command execution with root privileges. | 10 Oct |
| CVE-2026-75875 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-85029 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, delete arbitrary files, or execute arbitrary code due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-82891 | 8.1 high | 1.0% | no CPE yet | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to use of a hard-coded cryptographic key. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84249 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, and 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary management operations due to missing authentication for critical function. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84198 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84209 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84246 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-80381 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-81932 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-82895 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84035 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84057 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84058 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the TDS (Microsoft SQL Server) PRELOGIN packet decoder. A remote attacker who can send a specially crafted TDS PRELOGIN packet to a network monitored by an IBM Guardium Collector may cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code on the Collector appliance. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84272 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 are vulnerable to missing authentication in the edge-controller component. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary container images and gain control of managed edge clusters. | 10 Oct |
| CVE-2026-82344 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted TDS login fragments that exceed the fixed-size reassembly buffer, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution on the affected system. | 10 Oct |
| CVE-2026-82335 | 9.8 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the MongoDB protocol parser. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted MongoDB SCRAM username containing an excessive length and cause memory corruption, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution. | 10 Oct |
| CVE-2026-82900 | 9.1 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-82334 | 9.1 critical | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based out-of-bounds read in the TDS7 LOGIN7 protocol parser. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted TDS LOGIN7 packet containing invalid offset or length values, potentially causing information disclosure or denial of service. | 10 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84884 | 8.8 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 stores internal REST service-account passwords in a reversible plaintext-equivalent format. An authenticated attacker who gains access to the stored credential could recover the password and obtain an administrative REST access token. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84875 | 8.8 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84032 | 8.1 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84250 | 7.8 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable due to weak cryptographic protection and a hard-coded recovery key in the pkcrypto passkey component. A local attacker could exploit this vulnerability to recover the root password and gain root privileges. | 10 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84245 | 7.8 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation in the cp_wrapper component. A low-privileged local user could exploit this vulnerability to gain root privileges and access or modify sensitive system files. | 10 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84271 | 7.8 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a signature verification bypass in the patch installer. An attacker with local access could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | 9 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84891 | 7.5 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to use of hard-coded credentials. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84276 | 7.5 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 is affected by a denial-of-service vulnerability in the edge-controller. An unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to the edge-controller gRPC service can provide malformed task data that triggers an unchecked type assertion, causing the edge-controller process to terminate unexpectedly. | 12 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84275 | 7.5 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal in the GIM file-upload functionality. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to write arbitrary files to the Collector. | 12 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84862 | 7.2 high | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to insecure deserialization in the Quartz JDBC job store. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the affected system. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8405 | 6.5 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.1, and 12.2.2 's add-on feature of Guardium Data Protection named "Long Term Retention" (LTR) can expose sensitive credentials in debug mode. | Mon 26 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84882 | 6.5 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal in the Universal Connector Oracle Wallet upload component. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to write arbitrary files to the system. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84893 | 6.5 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection in the PESI service. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive information in the internal database. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84247 | 6.5 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84274 | 6.5 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 is affected by a sensitive information exposure vulnerability. During SECRET and API_KEY rotation processing, sensitive credential material is logged at INFO level by the edge-controller/edge-manager components. An authenticated attacker with access to the relevant application or container logs could obtain these credentials and use them to impersonate services or gain unauthorized access to the Guardium control plane. | 9 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84244 | 6.1 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Quick Search results grid. An unauthenticated attacker who can influence monitored database traffic could execute malicious script in the browser of an authenticated Guardium user. | 9 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84230 | 5.9 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a race condition resulting from concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-87980 | 5.5 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext storage of sensitive information in logs. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-84290 | 5.1 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is affected by an improper validation of user-supplied pointers in the WfpMonitor kernel driver. Certain METHOD_NEITHER IOCTL handlers dereference user-controlled pointers without adequate probing and exception handling, potentially allowing a privileged local attacker to cause a system crash or perform limited kernel-memory reads. | 13 Oct |
| CVE-2026-1274 | 4.9 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to a Bypass Business Logic vulnerability in the access management control panel. | Mon 26 Oct |
| CVE-2026-4917 | 4.9 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 could allow an administrative user to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to write arbitrary files on the system. | Sun 25 Oct |
| CVE-2026-4919 | 4.8 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an administrative user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | Mon 26 Oct |
| CVE-2026-4918 | 4.8 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an administrative user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | Mon 26 Oct |
| CVE-2026-1272 | 4.3 medium | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to Security Misconfiguration vulnerability in the user access control panel. | Mon 26 Oct |
| CVE-2026-4921 | 2.7 low | 0.00% | ibm, guardium_data_protection | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow an administrative user to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. | 20 Oct |
45 of 45
Download these 45 as CSV · subscribe to this list.
EPSS scores: 2026-10-28. NVD cursor: 2026-10-29 00:22. The News page shows only notable CVEs (KEV, your stack, new criticals, EPSS over 50%, or active exploitation per SSVC); this table has all of them.