Vulnerabilities
All
My stack
Known exploited
Public exploit
Critical (9+)
Likely exploited (EPSS ≥ 50%)
Changed, 24 h
New, 24 h
Sort:
risk
modified
published
CVSS
EPSS
| CVE | CVSS | EPSS | Vendor, product | Description | Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-9198KEVexploit ×11 | 9.8 critical | 29.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to chain /api/v1/auto_login (mints SUPERUSER tokens to any network caller) with /api/v1/validate/code (executes user code via exec()) to achieve full RCE on default Langflow deployments | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-93674exploit ×2 | 9.8 critical | 15.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-10134exploit ×2 | 10.0 critical | 2.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows an attacker to read every secret available to the Langflow process, read and modify every flow, conversation, message, file upload, and saved component in the Langflow database, can connect to internal services, abuse cloud metadata endpoints, laterally move to other tenants on the same Langflow instance, and Establish persistence by modifying the public flow's `tool_code` so normal `/api/v1/build/...` calls by any user re-execute attacker code at each build. | Sun 25 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7873exploit ×2 | 9.9 critical | 2.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands and read sensitive files including credentials, enabling complete system compromise and lateral movement. | Sun 25 Oct |
| CVE-2026-12940exploit | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 are vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution via environment variable injection in the MCP (Model Context Protocol) stdio launcher. The vulnerability exists in src/lfx/src/lfx/base/mcp/util.py where the DANGEROUS_ENV_VARS blocklist fails to include SHELLOPTS , BASHOPTS , and PS4 environment variables. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-17633exploit | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to code injection. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-104335exploit | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper access control. | 9 Oct |
| CVE-2026-107328exploit | 9.9 critical | — | ibm, langflow oss | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of code in eval/exec. | 5 h ago |
| CVE-2026-107327exploit | 9.9 critical | — | ibm, langflow oss | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to missing authorization. | 7 h ago |
| CVE-2026-107329exploit | 9.9 critical | — | ibm, langflow oss | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. | 7 h ago |
| CVE-2026-93680exploit ×2 | 9.8 critical | — | ibm, langflow oss | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. | 7 h ago |
| CVE-2026-110200exploit | 6.5 medium | — | ibm, langflow oss | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext storage of sensitive information. | 7 h ago |
| CVE-2026-9103 | 9.8 critical | 3.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper authentication in the /api/v1/login/auto_login endpoint. The endpoint issues long-lived superuser bearer tokens without requiring authentication when the AUTO_LOGIN configuration is enabled (enabled by default), which may allow an unauthenticated network attacker to obtain full administrative access. Additionally, permissive cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) settings may allow tokens to be exposed to unintended origins, increasing the risk of unauthorized access. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-10561 | 10.0 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 has an vulnerability due to an improper isolation of Python execution combined with an authentication bypass that allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the host system, resulting in complete compromise | Sun 25 Oct |
| CVE-2026-9135 | 9.9 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8476 | 9.9 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the disk-based caching mechanism. The AsyncDiskCache class uses Python's unsafe pickle.loads() function to deserialize cached objects from disk without validation, integrity verification, or authentication, enabling arbitrary code execution when malicious pickle payloads are processed. Attackers who can influence cached data through file system access, malicious workflow inputs, custom components, or API manipulation can achieve complete system compromise with the privileges of the Langflow server process. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8481 | 9.9 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint. The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts user-supplied Python code and executes it directly using Python's built-in exec() function without sandboxing, input validation, or privilege restrictions, enabling any authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands with the full privileges of the Langflow server process. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8635 | 9.9 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8859 | 9.9 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files to unintended locations due to improper input validation in the APIRequest component. A path traversal vulnerability exists when the "Save to File" feature is enabled, where filenames extracted from HTTP response Content-Disposition headers are not sanitized before being joined to the temporary directory path. An attacker controlling an external HTTP server can supply crafted filename values containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../), enabling arbitrary file writes to locations accessible by the Langflow process. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-13435 | 9.9 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in the PythonREPL sandbox implementation. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-12946 | 9.9 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7524 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.1 could allow remote code execution due to improper validation of symbolic links during archive extraction. | Mon 26 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7663 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 could allow unauthenticated attackers to access protected MCP project resources and execute MCP operations due to improper authorization enforcement in the Streamable MCP transport endpoint. | Sun 25 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7803 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow arbitrary code execution due to improper validation of flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields. | Sun 25 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7871 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows users with Redis access to execute arbitrary code with full application privileges, compromising all secrets, data, and system integrity. | Sun 25 Oct |
| CVE-2026-9202 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to create unlimited user accounts on any Langflow instance; when NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true (documented deployment option), newly created accounts are immediately active and can authenticate to reach RCE endpoints, bypassing the need for AUTO_LOGIN. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-13448 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Lanflow OSS contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the public flow build endpoint ( /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow ). The vulnerability stems from an incomplete denylist in the validate_public_flow_no_code_execution() function that fails to block several code-execution agent components including OpenDsStarAgent, CodeActAgentSmolagents, and CSVAgent. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8505 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 has a vulnerability in Langflow's webhook authentication logic allows unauthenticated users to trigger the execution of any flow. The system incorrectly bypasses API key validation when the WEBHOOK_AUTH_ENABLE configuration is set to False (which is the default setting). This allows a remote attacker who knows a flow's UUID to execute it as if they were the owner, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE). | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-104334 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-93675 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an expected dependency confusion. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-14499 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input in the Python Interpreter component. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7667 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to create a malicious flow pointing to an attacker-controlled URL that returns a specially crafted Content-Disposition header (e.g., filename="../../../target/path" ), enabling arbitrary file write operations with attacker-controlled content to any path accessible by the Langflow process. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7755 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow remote code execution due to incomplete validation enforcement on MCP server configuration files. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8056 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to override component parameters at runtime via the API. A critical security flaw exists in the parameter filtering mechanism within the `apply_tweaks()` function. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8182 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 installations allow anyone on the internet to execute arbitrary code on the server without any credentials via 2 HTTP requests. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8478 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-9196 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute unintended code during Agentic Assistant validation due to improper handling of LLM‑generated components. The application executes model‑generated Python code in the backend during validation prior to user approval, which may allow an attacker to trigger side effects such as outbound network access, file system interaction, or data exfiltration with the privileges of the Langflow backend process. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-17623 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper validation of the command field in MCP server configurations. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-17630 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of configuration parameters. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-17624 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of module imports. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-17632 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of Python code during AST-based security scanning. | Fri 23 Oct |
| CVE-2026-88962 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-97678 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper input validation. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-97655 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an incomplete blocklist in the code security scanner. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-97679 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('Code Injection') related to improper input validation. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-97676 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in code, resulting in a sandbox escape. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-97673 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper input validation. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-7872 | 8.1 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files including the JWT signing key and forge authentication tokens for any user. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-8183 | 7.7 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot " sequences ( /.. /) to v i ew arbitrary files on the system. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-12942 | 7.5 high | 1.0% | langflow | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot " sequences ( /.. /) to view arbitrary files on the system. | Fri 23 Oct |
50 of 122 · Next
Download these 122 as CSV · subscribe to this list.
EPSS scores: 2026-10-28. NVD cursor: 2026-10-29 00:22. The News page shows only notable CVEs (KEV, your stack, new criticals, EPSS over 50%, or active exploitation per SSVC); this table has all of them.