BaselineWatch
59327 CVEs · 135 in KEV
Desk
CVEs known59,327 New, 24 h1,070 Changed, 24 h1,265 In KEV135 Public exploit1,612 Match watchlist0

Vulnerabilities

All My stack Known exploited Public exploit Critical (9+) Likely exploited (EPSS ≥ 50%) Changed, 24 h New, 24 h Sort: risk modified published CVSS EPSS
CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSVendor, productDescriptionModified
CVE-2026-77642 9.3 critical 0.00% torproject, tor tor before 0.4.9.9 was prone to an out-of-bounds write when parsing a consensus or detached signature with unexpected signature digest type. Impact is minor for most Tor roles, but potentially major for directory authorities. This is TROVE-2026-019. 18 Oct
CVE-2026-44603 9.1 critical 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.7 has an out-of-bounds read by one byte via a malformed BEGIN cell, aka TROVE-2026-007. Mon 26 Oct
CVE-2026-44597 9.1 critical 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.7 has an out-of-bounds read when an END, a TRUNCATE, or a TRUNCATED cell lacks a reason in its payload, aka TROVE-2026-011. Mon 26 Oct
CVE-2026-77638 9.0 critical 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.11 is prone to a race condition where in just the right circumstances a rendezvous point could man-in-the-middle (impersonate) the onion service that the client was trying to reach. 18 Oct
CVE-2026-77584 8.2 high 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.10 did not reject a CONFLUX_LINK cell that arrives on a circuit which already has attached streams. A malicious client could send a RELAY_COMMAND_BEGIN before the CONFLUX_LINK on the same circuit, attaching an exit stream that would later end up orphan leaving a dangling circuit back-pointer and a use-after-free (UAF) when the circuit is freed. This is TROVE-2026-025. 18 Oct
CVE-2026-77641 8.2 high 0.00% torproject, tor tor before 0.4.9.9 was prone to a NULL write after free when sending a CONFLUX_SWITCH cell fails. The return value of relay_send_command_from_edge() was ignored, so a send failure (which calls circuit_mark_for_close() and removes the leg via cfx_del_leg()) would go undetected, causing the caller to write to the now-freed current leg and resulting in a crash. This is TROVE-2026-017. 18 Oct
CVE-2026-44601 7.5 high 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.7, when circuit queue memory pressure exists, can experience a client crash because of a double close of a circuit, aka TROVE-2026-009. Mon 26 Oct
CVE-2026-44602 7.5 high 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.7 has a NULL pointer dereference when a CERT cell is received out of order, aka TROVE-2026-006. Mon 26 Oct
CVE-2026-77587 7.5 high 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.11 is prone to a use-after-free (and potential double free) of a conflux object when a recovery leg revives a conflux set whose last linked leg has already been closed. A malicious exit node could use this to crash a client. This is TROVE-2026-026. 18 Oct
CVE-2026-44600 5.3 medium 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.7 mishandles accounting of the conflux out-of-order queue during the clearing of a queue, aka TROVE-2026-010. Mon 26 Oct
CVE-2026-44599 5.3 medium 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.7 can attempt or accept BEGIN_DIR via conflux legs, aka TROVE-2026-008. Mon 26 Oct
CVE-2026-77639 5.3 medium 0.00% torproject, tor Tor before 0.4.9.9 was prone to a compression bomb bypass where an attacker could concatenate many gzip or zlib sub-streams, each just under the per-stream detection threshold, to avoid the compression bomb check entirely. This is TROVE-2026-022. 18 Oct
CVE-2026-77640 5.3 medium 0.00% torproject, tor tor before 0.4.9.9 was prone to an infinite loop when decompressing a truncated zlib/gzip stream with done=1. A truncated stream never reaches Z_STREAM_END, causing zlib to return Z_BUF_ERROR with no input remaining, which buf_add_compress() mistook for a full output buffer and retried forever. Fixed by returning TOR_COMPRESS_ERROR in that case so the caller can abort cleanly. This is TROVE-2026-021. 18 Oct

13 of 13

Download these 13 as CSV · subscribe to this list.

EPSS scores: 2026-10-29. NVD cursor: 2026-10-29 00:22. The News page shows only notable CVEs (KEV, your stack, new criticals, EPSS over 50%, or active exploitation per SSVC); this table has all of them.