Vulnerabilities
All
My stack
Known exploited
Public exploit
Critical (9+)
Likely exploited (EPSS ≥ 50%)
Changed, 24 h
New, 24 h
Sort:
risk
modified
published
CVSS
EPSS
| CVE | CVSS | EPSS | Vendor, product | Description | Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-3357exploit | 7.8 high | 55.0% | microsoft, office, office_web_apps, office_web_apps_server | Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2013 RT SP1, Office 2016, Word for Mac 2011, Word 2016 for Mac, Word Viewer, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2010 SP2, SharePoint Server 2013 SP1, Excel Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2013 SP1, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2013 SP1, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2, and Office Web Apps Server 2013 SP1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2016-3313exploit | 7.8 high | 50.0% | microsoft, office, word_for_mac, word_viewer | Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, 2010 SP2, 2013 SP1, 2013 RT SP1, and 2016, Word 2016 for Mac, and Word Viewer allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2015-2468exploit | 9.3 high | 43.0% | microsoft, office, office_compatibility_pack, sharepoint_server | Microsoft Word 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Word 2013 SP1, Word 2013 RT SP1, Office for Mac 2011, Office for Mac 2016, Office Compatibility Pack SP3, Word Viewer, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2010 SP2 and 2013 SP1, Word Web Apps 2010 SP2, and Office Web Apps Server 2013 SP1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2015-2470exploit | 9.3 high | 27.0% | microsoft, office, word, word_viewer | Integer underflow in Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2013 RT SP1, Office for Mac 2011, and Word Viewer allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Integer Underflow Vulnerability." | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2015-2469exploit | 9.3 high | 27.0% | microsoft, office, word | Microsoft Word 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, and Office for Mac 2011 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-68749exploit | 8.2 high | 1.0% | rrrene, htmlsanitizeex | Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity vulnerability in the CSS scrubber in rrrene html_sanitize_ex allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust server CPU via a long CSS declaration in sanitized HTML. The declaration regex in HtmlSanitizeEx.Scrubber.CSS.scrub/1 matches the property name with an unbounded greedy [-\w]+ followed by a mandatory :, so a long run of word characters not followed by a colon makes the engine give back one character at a time and retry the colon at every start offset. The work is quadratic in the length of the run, and no length cap is applied to the CSS handed to the scrubber. An 80 KB <style> body costs roughly 2.4 seconds of scheduler time, so a few concurrent requests saturate the BEAM scheduler pool and make the application unresponsive. The impact is CPU exhaustion only. Nothing is read, modified or disclosed. This issue affects html_sanitize_ex: from 0.3.1 before 1.4.5 and from 1.5.0-rc.0 before 1.5.3. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2016-3234 | 5.5 medium | 26.0% | microsoft, office, office_compatibility_pack, office_web_apps | Microsoft Word 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Office Compatibility Pack SP3, Word Viewer, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2010 SP2, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2013 SP1, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2, and Office Web Apps Server 2013 SP1 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2015-6093 | 9.3 high | 23.0% | microsoft, office, office_web_apps, office_web_apps_server | Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2013 RT SP1, Office 2016, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2010 SP2 and 2013 SP1, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2, and Office Web Apps Server 2013 SP1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2017-8512 | 8.8 high | 22.0% | microsoft, office, office_online_server, office_web_apps | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8509, CVE-2017-8510, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-0260, and CVE-2017-8506. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2016-0010 | 7.8 high | 21.0% | microsoft, excel_for_mac, office, powerpoint_for_mac | Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2013 RT SP1, Office 2016, Excel for Mac 2011, PowerPoint for Mac 2011, Word for Mac 2011, Excel 2016 for Mac, PowerPoint 2016 for Mac, Word 2016 for Mac, and Word Viewer allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2015-2423 | 4.3 medium | 20.0% | microsoft, excel, office, powerpoint | Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT Gold and 8.1, Windows 10, Excel 2007 SP3, PowerPoint 2007 SP3, Visio 2007 SP3, Word 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Excel 2010 SP2, PowerPoint 2010 SP2, Visio 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Excel 2013 SP1, PowerPoint 2013 SP1, Visio 2013 SP1, Word 2013 SP1, Excel 2013 RT SP1, PowerPoint 2013 RT SP1, Visio 2013 RT SP1, Word 2013 RT SP1, and Internet Explorer 7 through 11 allow remote attackers to gain privileges and obtain sensitive information via a crafted command-line parameter to an Office application or Notepad, as demonstrated by a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity, aka "Unsafe Command Line Parameter Passing Vulnerability." | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2015-0085 | 9.3 high | 19.0% | microsoft, excel, excel_viewer, office | Use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Excel 2007 SP3, PowerPoint 2007 SP3, Word 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Excel 2010 SP2, PowerPoint 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Office 2013 Gold and SP1, Word 2013 Gold and SP1, Office 2013 RT Gold and SP1, Word 2013 RT Gold and SP1, Excel Viewer, Office Compatibility Pack SP3, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2010 SP2, Excel Services on SharePoint Server 2013 Gold and SP1, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2013 Gold and SP1, Web Applications 2010 SP2, Office Web Apps Server 2010 SP2, Web Apps Server 2013 Gold and SP1, SharePoint Server 2007 SP3, Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 SP3, SharePoint Foundation 2010 SP2, SharePoint Server 2010 SP2, SharePoint Foundation 2013 Gold and SP1, and SharePoint Server 2013 Gold and SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Component Use After Free Vulnerability." | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2018-0851 | 8.8 high | 19.0% | microsoft, office, office_word_viewer, outlook | Microsoft Office 2007 SP2, Microsoft Office Word Viewer, Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, Microsoft Office 2013 SP1 and RT SP1, Microsoft Office 2016, and Microsoft Office 2016 Click-to-Run (C2R) allow a remote code execution vulnerability, due to how Office handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE is unique from CVE-2018-0852. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2017-8509 | 8.8 high | 18.0% | microsoft, office, office_compatibility_pack, office_web_apps | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8510, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-8512, CVE-2017-0260, and CVE-2017-8506. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2016-0025 | 7.3 high | 17.0% | microsoft, office, office_compatibility_pack, office_online_server | Microsoft Word 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Word 2013 SP1, Word 2013 RT SP1, Office 2016, Word 2016, Word for Mac 2011, Word 2016 for Mac, Office Compatibility Pack SP3, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2010 SP2, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2013 SP1, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2, Office Web Apps Server 2013 SP1, and Office Online Server allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2017-0281 | 7.8 high | 16.0% | microsoft, office, office_online_server, office_web_apps | Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2016, Office Online Server 2016, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2,Office Web Apps 2013 SP1, Project Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016, SharePoint Foundation 2013 SP1, Sharepoint Server 2010 SP2, Word 2016, and Skype for Business 2016 allow a remote code execution vulnerability when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0261 and CVE-2017-0262. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2015-2477 | 9.3 high | 14.0% | microsoft, office, word_viewer | Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office for Mac 2011, Office for Mac 2016, and Word Viewer allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2016-0012 | 4.3 medium | 11.0% | microsoft, excel, office, powerpoint | Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Excel 2007 SP3, PowerPoint 2007 SP3, Visio 2007 SP3, Word 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Excel 2010 SP2, PowerPoint 2010 SP2, Visio 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Excel 2013 SP1, PowerPoint 2013 SP1, Visio 2013 SP1, Word 2013 SP1, Excel 2013 RT SP1, PowerPoint 2013 RT SP1, Word 2013 RT SP1, Office 2016, Excel 2016, PowerPoint 2016, Visio 2016, Word 2016, and Visual Basic 6.0 Runtime allow remote attackers to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism via unspecified vectors, aka "Microsoft Office ASLR Bypass." | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-40364 | 8.4 high | 4.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office, office_long_term_servicing_channel | Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | Mon 26 Oct |
| CVE-2026-66297 | 5.0 medium | 2.0% | livebook | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (OS Command Injection) vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows command injection into generated deployment setup commands. LivebookWeb.Hub.Teams.DeploymentGroupAgentComponent.docker_instructions/2 and LivebookWeb.Hub.Teams.DeploymentGroupAgentComponent.fly_instructions/4 in lib/livebook_web/live/hub/teams/deployment_group_agent_component.ex interpolate deployment group environment variable values into the generated Docker and Fly.io setup commands without shell escaping. The values originate from the deployment group configuration and reach the sinks through Livebook.Hubs.Dockerfile.online_docker_info/3. Both sinks place the value inside a double-quoted shell word, so a value containing a command substitution such as $(...) or backticks is evaluated by the shell without any need to break out of the quoting, and a literal double quote terminates the quoted word and allows arbitrary further tokens. The generated command is displayed in the Livebook web interface with a copy button, so a user who copies it and runs it without reviewing it first executes the injected commands on their own machine, under their own account. An attacker requires privileges sufficient to set deployment group environment variables, while the resulting code execution occurs on the machine of whoever runs the generated command. The Kubernetes instructions are not affected, because they render the same values into a YAML manifest with escaping rather than into a shell command. This issue affects livebook: from 0.13.0 before 0.18.7 and from 0.19.0 before 0.19.9. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2026-72466 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | no CPE yet | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xprtrdma: Fix bcall rep leak and unbounded peek rpcrdma_is_bcall() decodes a reply's first words to decide whether the frame is a backchannel call. Two issues in that decode path let a short or malformed reply leak the receive buffer and drain the Receive queue. First, the speculative peek p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 0); /* five p++ reads follow */ asks xdr_inline_decode() for zero bytes, which returns xdr->p without consulting xdr->end. The five subsequent __be32 reads can then walk up to 20 bytes past the wire payload into stale regbuf contents and misclassify the reply as a backchannel call. Second, after the post-peek p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 3 * sizeof(*p)); if (unlikely(!p)) return true; the short-header arm returns true without calling rpcrdma_bc_receive_call(). The contract with the caller is that a true return transfers ownership of rep to the backchannel path: rpcrdma_reply_handler() if (rpcrdma_is_bcall(r_xprt, rep)) return; /* bare return, skips out_post */ ... out_post: rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, credits + ...); Because rpcrdma_bc_receive_call() never ran, no one took rep, but rpcrdma_reply_handler still bare-returns past rpcrdma_rep_put() and rpcrdma_post_recvs(). The rep, with its persistently DMA-mapped receive buffer, is orphaned on rb_all_reps and freed only at transport teardown. This completion reposts nothing, so its slot is reclaimed only when a later forward-channel reply reaches out_post and rpcrdma_post_recvs() allocates a fresh rep to backfill; absent that traffic the Receive queue drains and the peer's Sends draw RNR NAKs. Fix by consulting xdr->end after the zero-length peek so the five __be32 reads cannot run unless 20 bytes of wire payload remain. A byte-precise comparison against xdr->end is required because a non-4-aligned receive rounds the stream's word count up past the true payload. Also return false from the short-header arm so the reply falls through the normal out_norqst cleanup chain (rpcrdma_rep_put() plus rpcrdma_post_recvs()). | 16 Oct |
| CVE-2026-70300 | 9.8 critical | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Untrusted pointer dereference in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 14 Oct |
| CVE-2026-70470 | 9.5 critical | 1.0% | flowiseai, flowise | Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, Flowise validatePythonCodeForDataFrame in packages/components/src/pythonCodeValidator.ts can be bypassed with Unicode homoglyph identifiers, allowing arbitrary Python execution inside Pyodide and full OS command execution on the Flowise host via Pyodide js module interop. The validator gates pyodide.runPythonAsync in packages/components/nodes/agents/CSVAgent/CSVAgent.ts and packages/components/nodes/agents/AirtableAgent/AirtableAgent.ts with an ASCII word-boundary blacklist. JavaScript regex word boundaries are ASCII-only, while Python 3 NFKC-normalizes identifiers at parse time, so homoglyph forms such as __cl𝐚ss__, __subcl𝐚sses__, __b𝐚se__, and __b𝐮iltins__ bypass the blacklist and are parsed as their ASCII equivalents. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3. | Sat 24 Oct |
| CVE-2025-59252 | 9.3 critical | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_word_copilot | Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | 8 Oct |
| CVE-2026-72420 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | no CPE yet | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md/raid5: avoid R5_Overlap races while breaking stripe batches KCSAN report a race in break_stripe_batch_list() vs. raid5_make_request() on sh->dev[i].flags (plain word write vs. atomic bit op).. and .. one possible scenario is: CPU1 CPU2 break_stripe_batch_list(sh1) -> handle sh2 -> lock(sh2) -> sh2->batch_head = NULL -> unlock(sh2) -> test_and_clear_bit(R5_Overlap, sh2->dev[i].flags) -> wake_up_bit(sh2->dev[i].flags) raid5_make_request() -> add_all_stripe_bios(sh2) -> lock(sh2) -> stripe_bio_overlaps(sh2) returns true batch_head is NULL, so new bio overlap exist bio on sh2 -> true -> set_bit(R5_Overlap, sh2->dev[i].flags) -> unlock(sh2) -> wait_on_bit(sh2->dev[i].flags) -> sh2->dev[i].flags = sh1->dev[i].flags & ~R5_Overlap No wait_up_bit(), CPU2 could be wait_on_bit() forever... Fix by : - Expand the protect zone. - Use batch_head's device flag's snaphot when no held head_sh->stripe_lock. - Move sh/head_sh->batch_head = NULL to the end of protected zone , and , any concurrent add_all_stripe_bios() grabs sh->stripe_lock now either: - see batch_head != null, and , is rejected by stripe_bio_overlaps() under the lock (no R5_Overlap wait ) , or , - sees batch_head == NULL, only after dev[i].flags has already been set and the prior R5_Overlap waiters worken. KCSAN report: ================================================ BUG: KCSAN: data-race in break_stripe_batch_list / raid5_make_request write (marked) to 0xffff8e89c8117548 of 8 bytes by task 4042 on cpu 0: raid5_make_request+0xea0/0x2930 md_handle_request+0x4a2/0xa40 md_submit_bio+0x109/0x1a0 __submit_bio+0x2ec/0x390 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x457/0x710 submit_bio_noacct+0x2a7/0xc20 submit_bio+0x56/0x250 blkdev_direct_IO+0x54c/0xda0 blkdev_write_iter+0x38f/0x570 aio_write+0x22b/0x490 io_submit_one+0xa51/0xf70 __x64_sys_io_submit+0xf7/0x220 x64_sys_call+0x1907/0x1c60 do_syscall_64+0x130/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e read to 0xffff8e89c8117548 of 8 bytes by task 4010 on cpu 5: break_stripe_batch_list+0x249/0x480 handle_stripe_clean_event+0x720/0x9b0 handle_stripe+0x32fb/0x4500 handle_active_stripes.isra.0+0x6e0/0xa50 raid5d+0x7e0/0xba0 md_thread+0x15a/0x2d0 kthread+0x1e3/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x37a/0x410 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 value changed: 0x0000000000000019 -> 0x0000000000000099 --> R5_Overlap | 21 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108426 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108427 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108428 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108429 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108430 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108431 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108432 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108437 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108439 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108440 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108441 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108442 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 20 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108443 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Off-by-one error in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108445 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108447 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108449 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108450 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-108451 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, office_2021, office_2024 | Numeric truncation error in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 19 Oct |
| CVE-2026-88202 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-88186 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-88150 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Use of uninitialized resource in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-83891 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-70302 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-70301 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 15 Oct |
| CVE-2026-70287 | 8.8 high | 1.0% | microsoft, 365_apps, microsoft_365, office_2021 | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 15 Oct |
50 of 189 · Next
Download these 189 as CSV · subscribe to this list.
EPSS scores: 2026-10-27. NVD cursor: 2026-10-28 23:22. The News page shows only notable CVEs (KEV, your stack, new criticals, EPSS over 50%, or active exploitation per SSVC); this table has all of them.