Learn: where a rule comes from
The ladder gives you the four words — standard, baseline, control, setting. This page answers the next question: who wrote the rulebook, and under whose authority. Every control on this site arrived by the same route. A law obliges somebody to act; a policy says what acting looks like; a framework structures the work; a catalogue holds the controls; a baseline picks the ones your kind of system gets; a setting is how one of them is enforced on a real device; and a check proves it was. Each step below names its publishers, with the address their own words live at and what it takes to read them.
The chain, in one picture
- Law and contract what obliges anyone to do this at all
- Policy what the government or agency directs, under that law
- Framework how the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise
- Control catalogue the controls themselves, written once for everyone
- Baseline the controls chosen for one kind of system
- Configuration setting how a control is enforced on a real device
- Check and evidence how conformance is expressed, measured and proved
Nothing is obliged to use the whole chain. A private business usually joins at the framework or the setting and has no policy rung at all; a DoD system has every rung and a second committee besides. That is what "normalised" means in practice, and the three traces below walk it.
Who publishes what, and for whom
The rows are the steps of the chain; the columns are who the publisher writes for. Reading across one row answers the question this page exists for: the same job, as NIST, DISA, NASA, CIS and the ACSC each answer it. Showing US federal civilian alone.
The same control, traced three ways
One control — a device that locks itself after a period of inactivity — carried down three different ladders. The control barely changes. Everything above and below it does.
A federal civilian system
The plain FISMA chain: obliged by statute, categorised, baselined, enforced, assessed.
-
Law and contract FISMA 2014
The agency must run an information security programme, and NIST's standards are mandatory for this system.
-
Policy OMB Circular A-130
OMB tells the agency what that programme looks like and binds it to the NIST framework.
-
Framework FIPS 199 and FIPS 200
The system is categorised moderate for confidentiality, integrity and availability.
-
Control catalogue NIST SP 800-53
AC-11 Device Lock: prevent further access by initiating a device lock after a period of inactivity.
-
Baseline NIST SP 800-53B
The moderate baseline includes AC-11, and the agency's parameter sets the period at 15 minutes.
-
Configuration setting macOS Security Compliance Project
On macOS: a screensaver idle time of 900 seconds, with the lock delay at zero, in a configuration profile.
-
Check and evidence NIST SP 800-53A
The assessor examines the profile and tests a machine; the result goes in the assessment that supports the authorisation.
How they are normalised
Four mechanisms do nearly all the work of turning one body's rules into another's, and each one is public.
- Control Correlation Identifiers — DISA breaks each NIST SP 800-53 control statement into single testable assertions and numbers them. A STIG rule cites the CCI, the CCI names the control, and a pile of findings about registry values becomes an answer about controls. This is the one joint that makes a DoD scan report legible to a civilian assessor.
- OSCAL — a catalogue, a profile and a baseline as data rather than prose. A baseline becomes a document that says "this catalogue, these controls, these parameters", which a program resolves. It is how this instance reads 800-53 and 800-171 at all.
- SCAP and the National Checklist Program — XCCDF for the checklist, OVAL for the test, and the National Checklist Program as the public shelf. The same STIG exists twice: as prose for a person and as content for a scanner.
- macOS Security Compliance Project — the worked example. Each macOS rule carries its references to 800-53, 800-171, the STIG, CIS and CMMC at once, and the build emits whichever baseline you asked for. One rule, many citations: that is normalisation done at the source instead of afterwards.
And the two paths into private business
Nothing on this page obliges a company by itself. Federal rules reach private business two ways. By contract: DFARS 252.204-7012 flows NIST SP 800-171 down to every defense supplier, and CMMC audits it; FAR 52.204-21 sets a fifteen-requirement floor in almost every other federal contract. By market: FedRAMP baselines is met once and sold to every agency. Everything else — NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Critical Security Controls, ISO/IEC 27001 and 27002 — is adopted because a customer asked or because it is a good idea, and a company can leave at any time. Which of those applies to you is the first thing to settle, because it decides whether the rest of this page is a requirement or a reading list.
What this site does with all of it
One pipeline, the same for every publisher: fetch, keep the exact bytes, normalise into requirements or settings, diff field by field against the previous version, and record the publisher's own stated reason where there is one. So the change register can show a control before and after; Controls searches every tracked catalogue at once; and Baselines builds the strictest published set for a platform and lets you trim it. A machine-generated summary is always labelled as one, and never replaces the publisher's words.
Every body, with its source
4 of 35 publishers, writing for US federal civilian, at the Check and evidence step · show all
DISA
A list that breaks each 800-53 control statement into single testable assertions, each with a CCI number that a STIG rule then cites.
The joint in the whole machine. A CCI is how 'this registry value' gets back to 'AC-11', and so how a pile of STIG findings becomes an answer about controls.
- Derives from
- NIST SP 800-53 (and further up: FISMA 2014, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200)
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- CCI list public
- On this instance
- 2026-07-14 · 1 version held · every version and what changed loaded 17 Oct
NIST
The Open Security Controls Assessment Language: catalogues, profiles, baselines, implementation statements and assessment results as JSON, XML or YAML.
The format that makes any of this computable. A baseline as an OSCAL profile is a document that says 'this catalogue, these controls, these parameters' — which a program can resolve, and a person cannot be trusted to.
- Derives from
- NIST SP 800-53 (and further up: FISMA 2014, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200)
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- OSCAL public
- NIST's OSCAL content public
SCAP and the National Checklist Program
Check and evidenceUS federal civilianUS defensePrivate businessNASANIST
XCCDF for the checklist, OVAL for the test, CPE for the product, and the NCP repository that holds the published checklists for each platform.
This is what a scanner reads. The same STIG exists as prose for a person and as SCAP content for a tool, and the NCP is the public shelf both come off.
- Derives from
- NIST SP 800-53 (and further up: FISMA 2014, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200)
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- National Checklist Program repository public
- SCAP public
CISA
A free self-assessment tool that walks an organisation through a chosen standard — CSF, 800-53, 800-171, CIS Controls, ICS standards — and reports the gaps.
The one entry here that is software rather than a document, and the easiest way for a small organisation to assess itself against a catalogue it did not write.
- Derives from
- NIST CSF 2.0, NIST SP 800-53, CIS Critical Security Controls (and further up: FISMA 2014, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200)
- Feeds into
- nothing here derives from it yet
- Read it at
- CSET public
- cisagov/cset on GitHub public
Names that collide
Most of the difficulty in learning this field is that several different things share a name. Each reading below is real; none of them is the wrong answer, so the thing to do is say which one you mean.
- CSET
- NASA OCIO — the Cybersecurity Standards and Engineering Team, which writes NASA's own configuration specifications (the ASCS set). source agency sign-in
- CISA — the Cyber Security Evaluation Tool, free software for assessing yourself against a chosen standard. source public
- Georgetown University — the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, a policy research centre — no controls, no baselines. source public
- FISMA, not FISA
- FISMA — the Federal Information Security Modernization Act: the statute behind every federal control on this site. source public
- FISA — the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: surveillance authority law. It publishes no controls, baselines or standards, and nothing on this site derives from it. source public
- CSI
- NIST, CSRC and NVD
- 800-53, 800-53A, 800-53B
What this page is not
It is not legal advice, and it is not a compliance determination: whether a given system is obliged to meet a given baseline is a question for the people who authorise it. Every link here goes to a publisher's own address, and the access chip says what that publisher requires of a reader — this site adds no access to anything. Nothing restricted is reproduced here. For the vocabulary, see how to read this site; for what this instance is actually holding, All standards and the change register.