BaselineWatch
5 publishers shown
Desk

Learn: where a rule comes from

The ladder gives you the four words — standard, baseline, control, setting. This page answers the next question: who wrote the rulebook, and under whose authority. Every control on this site arrived by the same route. A law obliges somebody to act; a policy says what acting looks like; a framework structures the work; a catalogue holds the controls; a baseline picks the ones your kind of system gets; a setting is how one of them is enforced on a real device; and a check proves it was. Each step below names its publishers, with the address their own words live at and what it takes to read them.

The chain, in one picture

1 Law and contract 2 publishers 2 Policy 2 publishers 3 Framework 3 publishers 4 Control catalogue 3 publishers 5 Baseline 3 publishers 6 Configuration setting 5 publishers 7 Check and evidence 3 publishers
  1. Law and contract what obliges anyone to do this at all
  2. Policy what the government or agency directs, under that law
  3. Framework how the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise
  4. Control catalogue the controls themselves, written once for everyone
  5. Baseline the controls chosen for one kind of system
  6. Configuration setting how a control is enforced on a real device
  7. Check and evidence how conformance is expressed, measured and proved

Nothing is obliged to use the whole chain. A private business usually joins at the framework or the setting and has no policy rung at all; a DoD system has every rung and a second committee besides. That is what "normalised" means in practice, and the three traces below walk it.

Who publishes what, and for whom

The rows are the steps of the chain; the columns are who the publisher writes for. Reading across one row answers the question this page exists for: the same job, as NIST, DISA, NASA, CIS and the ACSC each answer it. Showing US defense alone.

Which body publishes at each step of the chain, by who it writes for
StepUS defenseDoD systems and national security systems
Law and contractwhat obliges anyone to do this at all FISMA 2014DFARS 252.204-7012
Policywhat the government or agency directs, under that law DoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01CNSS policy
Frameworkhow the work is structured: categorise, select, assess, authorise FIPS 199 and FIPS 200NIST SP 800-37 (RMF)CMMC
Control cataloguethe controls themselves, written once for everyone NIST SP 800-53NIST SP 800-53ANIST SP 800-171
Baselinethe controls chosen for one kind of system CNSSI 1253DISA Security Requirements GuidesmacOS Security Compliance Project
Configuration settinghow a control is enforced on a real device DISA STIGsDISA STIG GPO packageDISA STIG Intune packageMicrosoft security baselinesNSA Cybersecurity Information Sheets
Check and evidencehow conformance is expressed, measured and proved Control Correlation IdentifiersOSCALSCAP and the National Checklist Program

The same control, traced three ways

One control — a device that locks itself after a period of inactivity — carried down three different ladders. The control barely changes. Everything above and below it does.

A DoD system

The same control, a different committee, and a rule concrete enough to run.

  1. Law and contract FISMA 2014

    FISMA applies, and for a national security system CNSS policy applies instead of the civilian line.

  2. Policy DoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01

    DoD adopts the RMF and puts DISA's content in force: the STIG is policy, not advice.

  3. Framework NIST SP 800-37 (RMF)

    Categorise, select, implement, assess, authorise, monitor — with an authorising official who signs.

  4. Control catalogue CNSSI 1253

    The 800-53 catalogue with the national security baselines and overlays applied, so the selected set differs from the civilian one.

  5. Baseline DISA Security Requirements Guides

    The Operating System SRG: the OS must initiate a session lock after a period of inactivity.

  6. Configuration setting DISA STIGs

    A named rule for this exact Windows release, CAT II, with check text and fix text — the registry value, and the command to set it.

  7. Check and evidence Control Correlation Identifiers

    The rule cites a CCI, the CCI points back at AC-11, and a scanner's XCCDF result rolls the finding up to the control.

How they are normalised

Four mechanisms do nearly all the work of turning one body's rules into another's, and each one is public.

And the two paths into private business

Nothing on this page obliges a company by itself. Federal rules reach private business two ways. By contract: DFARS 252.204-7012 flows NIST SP 800-171 down to every defense supplier, and CMMC audits it; FAR 52.204-21 sets a fifteen-requirement floor in almost every other federal contract. By market: FedRAMP baselines is met once and sold to every agency. Everything else — NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Critical Security Controls, ISO/IEC 27001 and 27002 — is adopted because a customer asked or because it is a good idea, and a company can leave at any time. Which of those applies to you is the first thing to settle, because it decides whether the rest of this page is a requirement or a reading list.

What this site does with all of it

One pipeline, the same for every publisher: fetch, keep the exact bytes, normalise into requirements or settings, diff field by field against the previous version, and record the publisher's own stated reason where there is one. So the change register can show a control before and after; Controls searches every tracked catalogue at once; and Baselines builds the strictest published set for a platform and lets you trim it. A machine-generated summary is always labelled as one, and never replaces the publisher's words.

Every body, with its source

5 of 35 publishers, writing for US defense, at the Configuration setting step · show all

Configuration settinghow a control is enforced on a real device

DISA (Defense Information Systems Agency)

Security Technical Implementation Guides: per-product rules, each with a severity (CAT I, II, III), the exact check text and the exact fix text.

The most concrete rung there is, and the reason this site exists. A STIG rule tells you the command to run, which no catalogue ever does — and because it is free and public, it is read far outside the DoD.

Derives from
DISA Security Requirements Guides (and further up: NIST SP 800-53, CNSSI 1253, DoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01, FISMA 2014, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200, CNSS policy)
Feeds into
NASA-SPEC-2600 (ASCS), macOS Security Compliance Project, DISA STIG GPO package, DISA STIG Intune package
Read it at
On this instance
V1R1 · 19 versions held · every version and what changed loaded 20 Oct

DISA

The same STIG rules as Windows Group Policy objects, ready to import into a domain.

A rung below the rule: the policy file that actually sets the registry value the rule asks about.

Derives from
DISA STIGs (and further up: DISA Security Requirements Guides, NIST SP 800-53, CNSSI 1253, DoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01, FISMA 2014, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200, CNSS policy)
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at
On this instance
October 2026 · 1 version held · every version and what changed loaded 17 Oct

DISA

The STIG rules expressed as Microsoft Intune settings-catalogue policies, for devices managed from the cloud rather than a domain.

The same control, the same rule, a third shape — which is what a configuration setting being platform-specific actually means in practice.

Derives from
DISA STIGs (and further up: DISA Security Requirements Guides, NIST SP 800-53, CNSSI 1253, DoDI 8500.01 and 8510.01, FISMA 2014, FIPS 199 and FIPS 200, CNSS policy)
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at
On this instance
October 2026 · 1 version held · every version and what changed loaded 17 Oct

Microsoft

The vendor's own recommended settings for each Windows and Office release, shipped as GPO backups and policy rules in the Security Compliance Toolkit.

The vendor is a publisher too, and often the first one: Microsoft's baseline for a new Windows release lands months before the STIG for it does.

Derives from
nothing on this page — it is a root
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at
On this instance
v2 · 10 versions held · every version and what changed loaded 15 Oct

US National Security Agency

Short, specific hardening guidance on one subject at a time — network infrastructure, Kubernetes, PowerShell, cloud identity — often with other countries' agencies as co-signers.

The gap-filler. When something new needs hardening and no catalogue or benchmark covers it yet, this is usually the first public guidance to exist.

Derives from
nothing on this page — it is a root
Feeds into
nothing here derives from it yet
Read it at

Names that collide

Most of the difficulty in learning this field is that several different things share a name. Each reading below is real; none of them is the wrong answer, so the thing to do is say which one you mean.

CSET
  • NASA OCIO — the Cybersecurity Standards and Engineering Team, which writes NASA's own configuration specifications (the ASCS set). source agency sign-in
  • CISA — the Cyber Security Evaluation Tool, free software for assessing yourself against a chosen standard. source public
  • Georgetown University — the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, a policy research centre — no controls, no baselines. source public
FISMA, not FISA
  • FISMA — the Federal Information Security Modernization Act: the statute behind every federal control on this site. source public
  • FISA — the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: surveillance authority law. It publishes no controls, baselines or standards, and nothing on this site derives from it. source public
CSI
  • NSA — a Cybersecurity Information Sheet: short hardening guidance on one subject. source public
  • CIS — the Center for Internet Security — the Controls and the Benchmarks. Easy to type as CSI and mean something else entirely. source public
NIST, CSRC and NVD
  • NIST — the institute itself, which publishes the standards. source public
  • CSRC — the Computer Security Resource Center: where the publications live. source public
  • NVD — the National Vulnerability Database: CVEs and their scores, run by NIST but nothing to do with the standards. source public
800-53, 800-53A, 800-53B
  • SP 800-53 — the control catalogue: what must be true. source public
  • SP 800-53A — the assessment procedures: how an assessor would be convinced. source public
  • SP 800-53B — the baselines: which controls a low, moderate or high system gets. source public

What this page is not

It is not legal advice, and it is not a compliance determination: whether a given system is obliged to meet a given baseline is a question for the people who authorise it. Every link here goes to a publisher's own address, and the access chip says what that publisher requires of a reader — this site adds no access to anything. Nothing restricted is reproduced here. For the vocabulary, see how to read this site; for what this instance is actually holding, All standards and the change register.